| Seiha Translations http://games.seiha.org/ |
|
| a theory http://games.seiha.org/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=30 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | The odd man [ Thu Apr 21, 2011 8:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | a theory |
i believe chitoste's habit in this game of messing up your relationship, inadvertantly, may actually be some lingering bizzaro luck from milfue...which would explain why hers is the only route in which it isn't messed up by chitoste...instead she gets amnesia...and chitoste's route...duh...its kind of hard to mess up your own relationship via random chance |
|
| Author: | X_Bacon [ Fri Apr 22, 2011 2:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a theory |
You're thinking too deep, it's just a common plot device. |
|
| Author: | The odd man [ Fri Apr 22, 2011 8:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a theory |
well...perhaps its just milfue's luck that immunized her from it? |
|
| Author: | X_Bacon [ Sat Apr 23, 2011 12:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a theory |
I dunno, she didn't have her luck at that time... Plot-wise, Milfie already got her own problem to deal with, so Chitose messing up with their relationship wasn't necessary. That and Milfie is so thickheaded she probably didn't even think about that possibility. |
|
| Author: | The odd man [ Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a theory |
true, but in her route, she sprayed the elsior full of it at the end of the first game...so maybe some lingered around?...and it still seems pretty unlucky to lose all your memory |
|
| Author: | MartialArtsMaster [ Sun Apr 24, 2011 6:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a theory |
You're getting two games mixed up. Milfeulle loses her memory in the third game, Eternal Lovers, not Moonlit Lovers. It's Moonlit Lovers where Milfeulle's relationship can't get messed up by Chitose. |
|
| Author: | The odd man [ Sun Apr 24, 2011 8:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a theory |
well dang...but my theory still holds |
|
| Author: | Rico S [ Tue Apr 26, 2011 6:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a theory |
One more thing I want to ask... This might be off-topic, but; If you played the first game, you will see that the moment Elsior is going to shoot the Black Moon with Chrono Break Cannon, Elsior was attacked by a fatal hit from Black Moon, making it cannot move, and almost losing energy to charge the cannon. But suddenly, the Angel that chosen by Tact saved the Elsior, in many ways, depends on the Angel itself...and they successfully destroyed the Black Moon. The question: What happens if Tact didn't get any of the Angel? It's a path that must be taken to have a relationship with Chitose. (Moonlit Lovers) But instead of telling us the story how the Black Moon was destroyed, the game displayed Chitose's past. Tact ended up traveling the frontier with Lester, with a cruiser...but when they return to Elsior, it wasn't damaged badly. I know 6 months can be used up for repairs on Elsior but there are none of the Angel helps Tact to charge the cannon, then maybe the Elsior could ended up destroyed with the second blow from Black Moon... |
|
| Author: | The odd man [ Tue Apr 26, 2011 5:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a theory |
wrong you DO still get an angel, they just have to dump you |
|
| Author: | Lester Killderros [ Wed Apr 27, 2011 12:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a theory |
It's possible to not get an angel, however it requires one of two things, hacks, or some serious glitch work |
|
| Author: | Rico S [ Wed Apr 27, 2011 5:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a theory |
| Author: | The odd man [ Wed Apr 27, 2011 8:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a theory |
| Author: | CerealGuns [ Wed Apr 27, 2011 11:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a theory |
| Author: | Rico S [ Thu Apr 28, 2011 2:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a theory |
| Author: | The odd man [ Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a theory |
| Author: | Rico S [ Fri Apr 29, 2011 1:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a theory |
| Author: | The odd man [ Fri Apr 29, 2011 4:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a theory |
| Author: | The_Undying_Mage [ Fri Apr 29, 2011 8:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a theory |
I'm pretty sure its impossible, they only get really mad. |
|
| Author: | The odd man [ Sat Apr 30, 2011 3:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a theory |
| Author: | The_Undying_Mage [ Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a theory |
I meant in ML |
|
| Author: | The odd man [ Sat Apr 30, 2011 11:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: a theory |
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|